@jon @Mastodon

I don't think that anyone serious is asking Mastodon to creating NFTs.

What it is being asked of the devs is to separate the technology from the common applications.

NFTs are more than just overpriced JPEGs being sold by scammers, they already work really well to have permissionless domain names and Decentralized Identifiers.

It would be a great weapon against censorship and it could solve the identity portability problem.

@raphael I imagine this is more or less out of scope for @Mastodon though. If they want to implement it, by all means that's fine, but if they don't that doesn't bother me either.

@jon @Mastodon not necessarily. In order to have censorship-resistant domain names, you'll have to make changes at some point of the name resolution stack: either get an ICANN-sanctioned top-level domain (hardest, but endgame for ENS and what it wants to do with .eth), or get OS vendors to be able to resolve ENS (hard, but less so), or (easiest) activity-pub servers can extend their implementation of webfinger.

Meaning, Mastodon devs can do if they wanted to.


@raphael @Mastodon I'm personally okay with domains being pulled from registrants, if necessary, in existing top-level domain registry model.

@raphael @Mastodon perhaps this should be directed towards Mastodon gGmbH, but I assume solving for censorship-resistance isn't a priority for the project.

@jon @Mastodon not sure what you mean. You are okay with the censorship?

@jon @Mastodon is ThePirateBay a "bad actor"? SciHub? What about Taiwan and Tibet not getting their own top-level domains because of China?

Also, bear in mind that pirate bay still exists, despite all of the forced domain changes. Trying to curb them by censorship does not work. It is as "necessary" as it is ineffective.

Sign in to participate in the conversation

jonleibowitz.social is a single-user instance!